shminux comments on Open Thread, October 20 - 26, 2013 - Less Wrong

2 Post author: Adele_L 21 October 2013 03:11AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (211)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: shminux 25 October 2013 04:43:19PM *  8 points [-]

Hmm, about 100 downvotes in the last couple of days, 1 per comment or so, suggest that someone here is royally pissed off at me. I wish I knew the reason. On the bright side, at least this forum provides some indication of a problem. When this happens to me IRL, I either never find out about it or deduce it months or years later based on second-hand information, rumors, or, in some cases, denied promotions/requests/opportunities. I wonder if this is a common experience? Situations like this is a significant reason why I would likely jump in with both feet if offered a chance to join a telepathic society.

Comment author: witzvo 28 October 2013 01:05:04AM 3 points [-]

Did you see that Daenerys and NancyLebovitz experienced a similar problem? Seems likely someones doing it systematically to several accounts.

Comment author: shminux 28 October 2013 04:18:08AM -1 points [-]

Thanks, I missed that discussion.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 25 October 2013 05:38:13PM 2 points [-]

I wonder if this is a common experience?

Well, "this" is broad, but I expect that failing to notice enmity, and relatedly being unaware of consequent social attacks, is a pretty common experience, especially in "polite" social contexts (that is, ones in which overt expressions of conflict violate social norms).

"Crocker's Rules" are an attempt to subvert this; you might find it useful to declare that you operate under them... though I would expect not... in cases like you describe I expect that the downvoter(s) will not wish to be identified.

I wish you luck in deciphering the reason(s).

Comment author: shminux 25 October 2013 05:57:55PM *  1 point [-]

As someone with no particular aptitude in general niceties, I always welcome Crocker's rules, and mistakenly assume that others do, too.

I wish you luck in deciphering the reason(s).

My best (but still low-confidence) guess, based on the timing and on being overly critical in a comment is that this may have been taken as overly harsh.

Comment author: Brillyant 25 October 2013 07:08:02PM 2 points [-]

For what it is worth, I really liked your comment. Though I guess I'd be pissed (for a minute) if someone said it to me. I didn't read the whole discussion, but she seemed pretty passioniate about her views. When I get that way, nothing makes me angrier than someone (rightly) pointing out that I'm "too passioniate" to discuss this clearly.