RichardKennaway comments on Why officers vs. enlisted? - Less Wrong

13 Post author: JoshuaFox 30 October 2013 08:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (143)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 31 October 2013 09:41:54AM 3 points [-]

A priori, I'd say any enlisted/NCO would prefer being an officer (if they didn't have to work for it, etc.).

There are lots of things people might prefer if they didn't have to work for them. :)

(in contrast to Chief Master Sergeants, about whom we might ask why they are not officers.)

Because they're at the top of their career, so why should they give that up to be at the bottom of a new career? This, I have read, is what some of them would say.

Of course, that begs the question of why there are two ladders, but given that there are, it seems a reasonable response.

Comment author: JoshuaFox 31 October 2013 01:29:56PM *  1 point [-]

OK, good points.

enlisted/NCO would prefer being an officer

To the extent that officer status correlates with agentiness, and that some people are not agenty, then some people would not want to be officers. I am not sure about the antecedents in the preceding sentence, however.