James_Miller comments on A Pure Math Argument for Total Utilitarianism - Less Wrong

-5 Post author: Xodarap 27 October 2013 05:05PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (36)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: James_Miller 27 October 2013 05:32:12PM *  5 points [-]

Many people, including myself, have the intuition that inequality is bad. In fact, it is so bad that there are circumstances where increasing equality is good even if people are, on average, worse off. If we accept the premises of this blog post, this intuition simply cannot be correct.

Don't arguments related to the badness of inequality often rely on the existence of envy such that if I envy you then my utility goes down as yours increases.

Comment author: Xodarap 27 October 2013 07:12:52PM 1 point [-]

Yes, one way to rescue this is to value equality instrumentally, instead of intrinsically.

Comment author: [deleted] 28 October 2013 10:08:39AM 0 points [-]

(Similarly, I tentatively am an average utilitarian, but I still value population size instrumentally.)