Jack comments on Why didn't people (apparently?) understand the metaethics sequence? - Less Wrong

12 Post author: ChrisHallquist 29 October 2013 11:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (229)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jack 05 November 2013 10:22:54AM 0 points [-]

Subjectivism requires that moral claims have truth values which , in principle, dpened on the individual making them

This is not true of all subjectivisms, as the link makes totally clear. Subjective simply means that something is mind-dependent; it need not be the mind of the person making the claim-- or not only the mind of the person making the claim. For instance, the facts that determine whether or not a moral claim is true could consist in just the moral opinions and attitudes where all humans overlap.

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 05 November 2013 10:38:23AM 0 points [-]

There are people who use "subjective" to mean "mental", but they sholudn't.