The question is not "would this be a net benefit" (and it probably would, as much as I cringe from it). The question is, are there no better options?
The question is, are there no better options?
Such as? Experimenting on animals? That will probably cause progress to be slower and think about all the people who would die from malaria in the meantime.
Another month has passed and here is a new rationality quotes thread. The usual rules are: