SarahC comments on The Costs of Rationality - Less Wrong

32 Post author: RobinHanson 03 March 2009 06:13PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (78)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 December 2010 03:43:44AM 1 point [-]

As I understand, computer animation (as in Pixar) has built-in capabilities for the physically impossible. For example, there's no constraint in the software that solid bodies have to have constant volume -- when Ratatouille bounces around, he's changing volume all the time for extra expressiveness and dramatic effect. In that way, "cinematic" reality is simpler than realistic reality -- though of course it takes more artistry on the part of the animator to make it look good.

Comment author: wedrifid 08 December 2010 04:16:37AM 1 point [-]

As I understand, computer animation (as in Pixar) has built-in capabilities for the physically impossible. For example, there's no constraint in the software that solid bodies have to have constant volume

That isn't technically impossible. ;)

Comment author: Alicorn 08 December 2010 04:26:03AM *  0 points [-]

Ratatouille is not a character, it's a food. The rat's name is Remy.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 December 2010 04:27:20AM 0 points [-]

Dang, forgot that.