hyporational comments on Good movies for rationalists? - Less Wrong

0 Post author: roland 09 November 2013 08:00AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (66)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: hyporational 09 November 2013 08:29:00AM *  11 points [-]

I don't think movies are good for much else than entertainment, and there's nothing wrong with that. Some are good for inspiring certain attitudes and motivations, but the effect isn't specific for rationality and tends to fade rather quickly. ETA: This has potential to be really bad for rationality, as Trevor correctly suspects.

I think any argument for a movie being better for teaching rationality than actually studying for the two hours is rationalization.

Gattaca inspires me to be the determinator for a while.

Comment author: roland 09 November 2013 09:51:47AM 4 points [-]

I don't think movies are good for much else than entertainment,

You raise an important question that applies to fiction in general.

But consider that EY's inspiration for AI came from science fiction novels. I was greatly inspired by HPMOR and I wonder if studying science for the equivalent amount of time would have been better. Truth is that even what you study in books fades away, either because you forget much of it or because the excitement also wears off after a while. You could argue that fiction has an advantage because it is much easier to remember stories/characters than raw science.

Comment author: hyporational 09 November 2013 01:05:07PM *  2 points [-]

Could you make a very inspirational and educational movie for rationalists? Probably. Are such movies actually made? Probably not. Good movies are expensive to produce and need to make money. Rationalists are a tiny niche market. Literature doesn't have this problem to the same extent. Also the time constraints of movies don't really allow much room for development of ideas.

Comment author: Emile 09 November 2013 03:31:00PM 3 points [-]

Moneyball, maybe? (I haven't seen it though)

Comment author: palladias 11 November 2013 05:05:54PM 0 points [-]

I liked the book better (and I liked the book a lot!)

Comment author: Desrtopa 12 November 2013 02:03:51AM 1 point [-]

I think any argument for a movie being better for teaching rationality than actually studying for the two hours is rationalization.

I tend to have a much easier time remembering, and generate more ideas during, information which is presented in a way I find entertaining.

Movies may not strike an ideal balance, but I think there's a lot to be said for absorbing information presented in an entertaining manner.

Comment author: hyporational 12 November 2013 04:04:29AM 0 points [-]

I would try to solve this by making non-fiction literature and studying techniques more entertaining.

Comment author: Desrtopa 12 November 2013 04:07:35AM 0 points [-]

Well, personally, I read nonfiction almost exclusively these days, but I can't do much to make the material more entertaining than the author made it.