Lumifer comments on Stranger Than History - Less Wrong

52 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 01 September 2007 06:57PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (329)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 02 April 2014 04:46:55PM 1 point [-]

I don't see why you would need high IQ either.

Not necessarily high, but higher.

Basically, each job has an appropriate IQ range. It's better to pick people from the higher end of that range than from the lower end.

Work habits, etc, can be judged by someone's ability to get things done, which can be judged from their resume as per standard recruitment procedures.

No, I don't think you can effectively evaluate things like work habits on the basis of a "normal" resume. There is a reason people are hired after interviews and, sometimes, test periods and not just on the basis of their resumes.

You seem to think IQ is a better indicator. Why?

IQ is not a better indicator of work habits. However it is a good indicator of the contribution that a person can make to your organization. To make obvious observations, people with higher IQ work faster, make fewer mistakes, need less things explained to them, can handle the unexpected better, etc. etc.