Creutzer comments on Stranger Than History - Less Wrong

52 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 01 September 2007 06:57PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (329)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Creutzer 07 April 2014 10:23:01AM 2 points [-]

Are you really saying that judging someone that way isn't a form of antisemitism?

Don't let your culturally trained pattern-matching go astray. Judging people for being extremely wealthy is not per se antisemitic. Only judging people for being extremely wealthy jews (while being okay with extremely wealthy non-jews) is.

Comment author: ChristianKl 07 April 2014 12:43:30PM 0 points [-]

If I know that someone's lastname is Rothshield I don't even know that the person is wealthy. I'm effectively judging them by actions of their ancestors.

Comment author: Creutzer 07 April 2014 02:11:04PM 2 points [-]

Yes, but that is entirely orthogonal to the question of whether it's antisemitism. brazil's point was merely that "Rothschild" brings to mind excessive riches more saliently than it brings to mind Judaism, and so any judgment of that may not be genuinely antisemitic.

Comment author: ChristianKl 07 April 2014 03:23:18PM 1 point [-]

70 years ago it would have brought up rich Jewish bankers with political power.

Things happened and you don't speak about rich powerful Jewish bankers. Now it might not bring up the same image anymore, does that mean it was antisemitic 70 years ago but isn't antisemitic today?

Comment author: Creutzer 07 April 2014 10:24:10PM 2 points [-]

If it brought up rich Jewish bankers 70 years ago and only brings up rich bankers now, it's obviously less antisemitic now than it used to be. But in any case, you cannot use the name "Rothschild" to make the point that a Jewish person would have a disadvantage in an election - you could at most make the point that someone whose name brings to mind rich Jewis people might have a disadvantage. I think this is more properly construed as the basis of brazil's original objection.

Comment author: brazil84 07 April 2014 11:17:06PM 2 points [-]

If I know that someone's lastname is Rothshield I don't even know that the person is wealthy.

You also don't know if they are Jewish.

Comment author: ChristianKl 08 April 2014 09:28:22AM 3 points [-]

Being Akashi Jewish is a racial category that has something to do with who your ancestors happen to be. If someone is named Rothshield that suggest at least partly Akashi Jewish ancestry.

People who descriminate against Jewish people often don't care whether the person is practicing Judaism but more about their ancestery.

Comment author: brazil84 08 April 2014 03:14:05PM 1 point [-]

Being Akashi Jewish is a racial category that has something to do with who your ancestors happen to be. If someone is named Rothshield that suggest at least partly Akashi Jewish ancestry.

Sure, and if someone is named Rothschild, it also suggests that they come from wealth. It doesn't mean they are wealthy and it doesn't mean they are Jewish.

By the way, I think the word you are looking for is "Ashkenazi" not "Akashi."