Leonhart comments on I notice that I am confused about Identity and Resurrection - Less Wrong

40 Post author: ialdabaoth 14 November 2013 08:38PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (80)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Leonhart 15 November 2013 11:44:11AM *  0 points [-]

Huh. Where did that happen?

It didn't. EY has consistently said the opposite.

From here, among many other places:

In retrospect, supposing that quantum physics had anything to do with consciousness was a big mistake.

Comment author: passive_fist 15 November 2013 10:32:15PM 1 point [-]

I didn't mean to say Elezier thought consciousness was created due to some quantum mechanism. If that's what it seemed like I was saying, I apologize for the misunderstanding. I am referring to, for example this: http://lesswrong.com/lw/pv/the_conscious_sorites_paradox/

However the whole debate over consciousness turns out, it seems that we see pretty much what we should expect to see given decoherent physics. What's left is a puzzle, but it's not a physicist's responsibility to answer. ...is what I would like to say. But unfortunately there's that whole thing with the squared modulus of the complex amplitude giving the apparent "probability" of "finding ourselves in a particular blob".

As Elezier himself admitted, his interpretation of the question hinges on MWI. If the copenhagen interpretation is taken, it breaks down. Unfortunately we have no idea if MWI is the correct interpretation to take. There are other interpretations, like the Bohmian interpretation, that also lack all the nasty properties of Copenhagen but avoid many-worlds.