gjm comments on Self-serving meta: Whoever keeps block-downvoting me, is there some way to negotiate peace? - Less Wrong

16 Post author: ialdabaoth 16 November 2013 04:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (281)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gjm 22 November 2013 12:08:17AM 2 points [-]

too infuriated

Oh! I can't help wondering whether there's some miscommunication going on here. Could you explain what infuriates you so?

Comment author: TheOtherDave 22 November 2013 01:19:47AM *  1 point [-]

No, I don't think it's miscommunication, nor is it your fault at all. I'm just being emotionally oversensitive due to personal stuff, exacerbated by the fact that I learned today that a family member died and am processing that.

But.. well, OK, let me try to sneak up on it a little.
Suppose it were true that someone I loved had killed themselves as a consequence of their experiences with being bullied in middle school. (This is in fact not at all true.)
Does it make any sense that I would react strongly and negatively to dismissing middle-school-level status maneuvering as silly, and dismissing concern with it as contemptible?

Comment author: gjm 22 November 2013 02:34:03AM *  3 points [-]

a family member died

Oh, shit. I'm sorry.

As to the middle-school-level business, let me try to answer your question and some other allied questions that might be relevant:

  • I was not saying, and do not believe, that there is anything contemptible or silly going on when people in middle school engage in middle-school-level anything.
  • I was not saying, and do not believe, that concern with karma and such matters is in fact either (1) middle-school-level status manoeuvring or (2) contemptible.
  • I didn't intend to say, though maybe I did by mistake, that everything that could be described as middle-school-level status manoeuvring is contemptible.
  • What I did say, and did intend to say, is that specifically calling something "middle-school-level", if the thing in question is being done by adults of (at least) normal mental capacity, is typically an expression of contempt. (And, in particular, I interpreted Lumifer as intending either to express such contempt on his own behalf or at least to imply that the LW admins might see debates and angst over karma as contemptible.)

I suppose none of those is actually an answer to your question (I'm hoping that the above may bypass it, as it were) but here is one: In such a situation I can entirely see how you might have that reaction, and I'd regard it as a reasonable but maybe not a rational, reaction to have.

[EDITED to try to fix a formatting screwup.]

Comment author: TheOtherDave 22 November 2013 05:07:18PM *  2 points [-]

I would also agree that calling something "middle-school-level" when being done by adults suggests that the adult in question is not particularly competent. E.g., I might talk about trying to find my way around Berlin using middle-school German. Whether this expresses contempt or not depends a lot on the subject and the context.

I would add that many people don't seem to get better at managing status games than a slightly above-average high-schooler, though that's probably not true for middle school.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 22 November 2013 04:19:57AM 0 points [-]

I would agree that it's not an entirely rational reaction to have.