Bundle_Gerbe comments on The Crackpot Offer - Less Wrong

42 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 08 September 2007 02:32PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (69)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: evand 04 June 2012 02:47:55PM 0 points [-]

Eliezer, did you realize at the time that what you had done was construct the basic outline of the proof that 2^aleph0 = aleph1? There was an interesting gem hiding in your disproof, had you looked. Reversed stupidity is not intelligence, and all that :)

Comment author: Bundle_Gerbe 21 September 2012 01:20:27PM *  5 points [-]

No 2^alpeh0=aleph1 is the continuum hypothesis, which is independent of the standard axioms of math, and can't be proven. I think maybe you mean he was close to showing 2^aleph0 is the cardinality of the reals, but I think he knew this already and was trying to use it as the basis of the proof.

Making mistakes like Eliezer's is a big part of learning math though, if we are looking for a silver lining. When you prove something you know is wrong, usually it's because of some misunderstanding or incomplete understanding, and not because of some trivial error. I think the diagonal argument seems like some stupid syntactical trick the first time you hear it, but the concept is far-reaching. Surely Eliezer came away with a bit better understanding of its implications after he straightened himself out.