EHeller comments on International cooperation vs. AI arms race - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (143)
Thats so incredibly broad as to be a useless definition of "scientist." Lets use "scientist" as someone engaged in basic research oriented around the natural word (as opposed to an engineer involved in more applied research). My categorization isn't perfect, but your grouping puts musicians,actors, programmers, actuaries,engineers,etc all in to an umbrella category of "scientist."
Most fundamental research happens at public institutions under public grants (even the private institutions get massive public subsidy). Also, as a matter of public-goods, economic theory would expect private institutions to be systematically underinvested in basic research.
I'm not suggesting that everyone who does those things is a scientist, but that those things CAN be studied scientifically.
For example, not all singers are scientists, but the people who created auto-tune probably did so through scientific research, and, at least in an objective note-matching sense, it makes singers better.