= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Stuart_Armstrong comments on Steelmanning Inefficiency - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (25)
From what perspective would it be improved? Because there's a reason there's no definition in the essay...
For me it's very difficult to follow the text without asking myself: "What are you arguing at the moment? What's the position against which you are arguing?"
You're starting to see the weakest point of the whole essay ^_^
But that makes it hard to critique. "The strongest argument" was not a very strong argument at all, which put the rest of the article on very shaky ground.