komponisto comments on Personal examples of semantic stopsigns - Less Wrong

44 Post author: Alexei 06 December 2013 02:12AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (69)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: komponisto 07 December 2013 05:05:13AM 4 points [-]

Because professional mathematicians understand and depend on the technical usage, there's little risk of the technical sense becoming diluted by such quasi-humorous, figurative allusions to the technical jargon, which can serve as a means of in-group bonding. When outsiders do it, hover, it's no longer clearly an allusion to something else, and risks being mistaken for a distinct technical usage in its own right, in addition to losing the slight humor/bonding value.

Another mathematical in-term that has been subject to similar abuse by outsiders is the word "isomorphic". When a mathematician speaks to a colleague of all the local cafeterias being isomorphic, this is clearly hyperbole -- but it's only clear if one understands the actual meaning and normal context of the word.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 07 December 2013 04:26:34PM 0 points [-]

Do you have evidence that people are actually misunderstanding what either of these terms mean?

Comment author: VAuroch 22 September 2014 08:31:24AM *  -1 points [-]

From what I've seen of cafeterias on large college campuses, it isn't actually hyperbole to say that "all the local cafeterias are isomorphic". They're technically distinct, but under a transformation that preserves all relevant properties, they can all be mapped to each other; they are the same up to isomorphism.