Comment on Open thread for December 9 - 16, 2013

Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:17:10 GMT

What if G1=BEP and G2=GEP and discussing outgroup irrationality is much easier than discussing ingroup irrationality? Now suppose G1 is significantly larger than G2, and perhaps even that discussing G1 is more relevant to G2 winning* and discussing G2 is more relevant to G1 winning. How is the situation going to look like for a member of G2 who's visiting G1? How about if you mix the groups a bit? Is it wrong?

if you have a better suggestion for how to talk about it I'm listening.

You connotationally implied the behaviour you described to be wrong. Can you denotationally do that?

*rationality is winning

Discuss