JoshuaZ comments on [Link] Anti-ageing compound set for human trials - Less Wrong

11 Post author: Gavin 22 December 2013 08:51PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (11)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 27 December 2013 04:48:58PM *  2 points [-]

In at least one paper I've seen on this subject, month was fixed as a 30 day period. But even without that, as an approximation, months work pretty well for reporting the rough increase. The difference between 29 and 31 days will get swamped in the error margin for anything less than six months or so. And since most months are 30 or 31, and many alternate, in practice, this will be very close to 30.5 days, so the difference will be negligible.