army1987 comments on Doublethink (Choosing to be Biased) - Less Wrong

33 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 14 September 2007 08:05PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (161)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Grognor 30 October 2011 12:49:58PM 4 points [-]

It goes along a little bit with joke comments, if you follow. I can't for-sure know what the motivations behind any given post are (surely some motivation is to receive karma even on good comments), but strong warning signs that a comment was posted mostly to receive karma include, roughly in order of strong indicators to weak indicators:

  • comment is very short
  • comment includes an emoticon
  • comment is intended as humor
  • comment that expresses reasons for having a belief that everyone at Less Wrong already has
  • comment has little actual content compared to number of words
  • (related to previous point) comment has no content except agreeing/disagreeing
  • comment has signals of pseudo-modesty such as, "perhaps", "maybe", "I think", "it seems", "possibly", etc.
  • comment is pure speculation
  • comment is made after previous ones, where an edit to a previous comment would have been appropriate (users cannot upvote a single comment multiple times, but multiple comments by a single author are fair play)
  • comment mentions karma
  • comment speaks in passive voice

Multiple items on this list prime me for down-voting behavior.

Comment author: [deleted] 07 April 2012 08:43:20PM 0 points [-]

comment is made after previous ones, where an edit to a previous comment would have been appropriate (users cannot upvote a single comment multiple times, but multiple comments by a single author are fair play)

Editing an old comment won't show up in the Recent Comments either, so by posting a new comment more people will read it.