Metus comments on A proposed inefficiency in the Bitcoin markets - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Liron 27 December 2013 03:48AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (138)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 27 December 2013 03:28:36PM -1 points [-]

An improvised model for explaining the seemingly exponential growth is the belief that there is inherent risk of being forgotten as a currency but that this risk falls exponentially with time or price itself.

There no reason why that risk should fall.

Bitcoins has such risks as a mathematician inventing a way to break public key crypto that would completely destroy it. Again if people build useable quantum computers, bitcoin is gone.

For being an digital currency bitcoin has massive amounts of transfer costs. It's possible that someone creates a better online currency.

Comment author: Metus 27 December 2013 08:56:26PM 0 points [-]

Why are we both downvoted?

Comment author: ChristianKl 29 December 2013 12:10:01AM 0 points [-]

I'm probably downvoted because lavalamp argued that I'm wrong on a factual level and my rebuttal of his post wasn't yet online.

Comment author: ESRogs 04 January 2014 01:02:45AM 0 points [-]

I didn't downvote you, but your points about cracked crypto or replacement currencies didn't seem to support the statement that there's no reason the risk should fall.

It seems to me that there are a variety of risks, of which some should go down with adoption and some should not.