Metus comments on A proposed inefficiency in the Bitcoin markets - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (138)
There no reason why that risk should fall.
Bitcoins has such risks as a mathematician inventing a way to break public key crypto that would completely destroy it. Again if people build useable quantum computers, bitcoin is gone.
For being an digital currency bitcoin has massive amounts of transfer costs. It's possible that someone creates a better online currency.
Why are we both downvoted?
I'm probably downvoted because lavalamp argued that I'm wrong on a factual level and my rebuttal of his post wasn't yet online.
I didn't downvote you, but your points about cracked crypto or replacement currencies didn't seem to support the statement that there's no reason the risk should fall.
It seems to me that there are a variety of risks, of which some should go down with adoption and some should not.