Mark_Friedenbach comments on [Link] Consciousness as a State of Matter (Max Tegmark) - Less Wrong

15 [deleted] 08 January 2014 06:11PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (30)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 January 2014 09:05:16PM 1 point [-]

Are they? Minds are optimized by evolution. That's not the same as for evolution.

Comment author: cousin_it 08 January 2014 09:08:42PM *  1 point [-]

That's too abstract, let's go down a level, I just meant that if catching rabbits is good for your genes, you might evolve eyes that see rabbits, not wavefunctions transformed to Fourier space or something. Edited the bit you were responding to, I guess it was unclear.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 January 2014 11:43:09PM 0 points [-]

You said:

Maybe a better question would be, which ways of looking at the wavefunction are the most likely to contain evolution?

But using your example, eyes don't "contain" evolution. They provide a capability which is advantageous under natural selection, but they do not themselves perform evolution by natural selection. It's not clear to me that we should expect any connection with consciousness and evolution, other than the historical description of how natural consciousness came to be.