hyporational comments on Stupid Questions Thread - January 2014 - Less Wrong

10 Post author: RomeoStevens 13 January 2014 02:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (293)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: hyporational 13 January 2014 07:04:32AM *  0 points [-]

Not to me obviously. Not necessarily to my parents either, but I think they might have been quite lucky in addition to being good parents.

Doesn't money take care of you when old too? As a side note, if I were old, dying and in a poor enough condition that I couldn't look after myself, I'd rather sign off than make other people take care of me because I can't imagine that being an enjoyable experience.

Comment author: Calvin 13 January 2014 07:12:18AM *  0 points [-]

Still, if it is possible to have a happy children (and I assume happy humans are good stuff), where does the heap of dis-utility come into play?

EDIT: It is hard to form a meaningful relationship with money, and I would reckon that teaching it to uphold values similar to yours isn't an easy task either. As for taking care I don't mean palliative care as much as simply the relationship you have with your child.

Comment author: hyporational 13 January 2014 07:27:10AM *  0 points [-]

You can have relationships with other people, and I think it's easier to influence what they're like.

I'll list some forms of disutility later, but I think for now it's better not to bias the answers to the original question further. I removed the "heap of disutility" part, it was unnecessarily exaggerated anyway.