shminux comments on On Voting for Third Parties - Less Wrong

6 Post author: Coscott 13 January 2014 03:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: shminux 13 January 2014 06:37:45AM *  -1 points [-]

In how many US presidential elections did the 3rd party voting affect the outcome? The '2000 US election where Nader played the spoiler is the most recent one, and it has certainly affected the world in profound ways (for example, the Iraq war likely would not have happened, 9/11 or no, the market regulation might have been tighter, etc.).

I would say that if you estimate the number of likely 3rd party voters in your state to be insufficient to change the election outcome in your state with, say, 95% probability, then by all means, vote a 3rd party, otherwise vote strategically.

Comment author: knb 14 January 2014 03:06:16AM 1 point [-]

Perot was a spoiler in 1992. Teddy Roosevelt was arguably a spoiler in 1912. Or (depending on how you look at it) Taft was a spoiler for Roosevelt.