Moss_Piglet comments on Dangers of steelmanning / principle of charity - Less Wrong

88 Post author: gothgirl420666 16 January 2014 06:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (91)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Moss_Piglet 14 January 2014 10:08:01PM 3 points [-]

The comparison doesn't have a great connotation, given that "fundamentalist" is typically an epithet, but it's not too far off in terms of the denotation.

Personally though, I would say it's more of an Exoteric / Esoteric split; conservatives seem to spend most of their effort preserving outward forms and rituals of their cultures in an effort to keep the fire going, where reactionaries see it as burnt out already and so look back for the essential (in both senses of the word) elements to spark a new one. A good example is comparing Chesterton's Catholic apology with Evola's promotion of Tradition, not to imply that you can't be a Catholic reactionary but just as an example of a differing mindset. Of course, esoterica being what it is, it's a bit tough to get a grip on and much easier to talk about than to understand fully.

Comment author: MugaSofer 17 January 2014 01:59:21AM *  -1 points [-]

"fundamentalist" is typically an epithet

Of course, "reactionary" was also traditionally a derogatory term. So perhaps that isn't surprising.

Comment author: Lumifer 17 January 2014 02:02:17AM 1 point [-]

Of course, "reactionary" was also traditionally a derogatory term.

In the context of religious studies "fundamentalist" is not derogatory but descriptive.

Comment author: MugaSofer 17 January 2014 03:37:56AM 0 points [-]

Most epithets start out as descriptive terms with some sort of negative connotation.