asr comments on Understanding and justifying Solomonoff induction - Less Wrong

1 Post author: gedymin 15 January 2014 01:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (75)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: asr 23 January 2014 04:17:06PM *  -1 points [-]

"And then what you're saying is that the Universal Prior only applies to SIHs, and not (at least, not directly) to hypotheses such as "this patient has cancer".

I agree that Solomonoff induction isn't particularly relevant to most practical cases. Solomonoff Induction tries to explain what your prior should be if you didn't know anything about the world. But in any real context, we actually know a lot about the world.

Medical diagnostics is an apt example. Here, we have especially good priors, since we have accurate medical statistics. We can measure the overall incidence rates of cancer in the population overall, and typically we also have statistics for particular age and sex cohorts. There's no reason to start from "how easy is it to write a program to describe 'cancer' in some fixed language."