SaidAchmiz comments on Rationalists Are Less Credulous But Better At Taking Ideas Seriously - Less Wrong

43 Post author: Yvain 21 January 2014 02:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (285)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Locaha 21 January 2014 07:28:13AM 11 points [-]

We investigate with a cross-sectional study, looking at proto-rationalists versus experienced rationalists. Define proto-rationalists as those respondents to the Less Wrong survey who indicate they have been in the community for less than six months and have zero karma (usually indicative of never having posted a comment). And define experienced rationalists as those respondents to the Less Wrong survey who indicate they have been in the community for over two years and have >1000 karma (usually indicative of having written many well-received posts).

This is an incredibly bad definition of a rationalist. What you actually research here are people who fit into the mainstream of LW.

Comment author: MugaSofer 21 January 2014 05:42:07PM 3 points [-]

... which is somewhat relevant to whether LW-style "rationalist training" makes one irrational, yes?