Brillyant comments on Rationalists Are Less Credulous But Better At Taking Ideas Seriously - Less Wrong

43 Post author: Yvain 21 January 2014 02:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (285)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Brillyant 21 January 2014 05:04:05PM 2 points [-]

Yvain isn't talking about rationality, he's talking about membership in a rationalist group.

My understanding is that one's rationality (or ability to be rational) would increase as a result of participation in rationalist training. Hence, I see your disctinction, but little, if any, difference.

In this case, he assumes (1) LW is rationalist and (2) LW is good at providing training that makes a participating member more rational.

Karma does not necessarily have anything to do with rationality, being rational, rationalist training, etc. It is a point system in which members of LW give points to stuff they want more of. It has also been used as a reward for doing tasks for free for LW, mass blocks of downvoting for dissenting political views, and even filling out the survey we are talking about in this post.

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 21 January 2014 05:41:32PM *  8 points [-]

In this case, he assumes (1) LW is rationalist and (2) LW is good at providing training that makes a participating member more rational.

...(3) No one turns up as a newbie at LW having already learnt rationality.

Comment author: MugaSofer 21 January 2014 05:39:15PM 1 point [-]

My understanding is that one's rationality (or ability to be rational) would increase as a result of participation in rationalist training.

That it, is in fact, the question Yvain is discussing.