Manfred comments on Open thread, January 25- February 1 - Less Wrong

8 Post author: NancyLebovitz 25 January 2014 02:52PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (316)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Manfred 25 January 2014 07:13:57PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: Locaha 25 January 2014 08:36:09PM 3 points [-]

Actually, I started reading that one and found it too hard.

Comment author: edanm 25 January 2014 09:18:16PM 0 points [-]

IS this a good book to start with? I know it's the standard "Bayes" intro around here, but is it good for someone with, let's say, zero formal probability/statistics training?

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 26 January 2014 02:45:09PM 3 points [-]

I was under the impression that the "this is definitely not a book for beginners" was the standard consensus here: I seem to recall seeing some heavily-upvoted comments saying that you should be approximately at the level of a math/stats graduate student before reading it. I couldn't find them with a quick search, but here's one comment that explicitly recommends another book over it.

Comment author: [deleted] 25 January 2014 10:02:32PM 0 points [-]

I think it's even better if you're not familiar with frequentist statistics because you won't have to unlearn it first, but I know many people here disagree.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 26 January 2014 04:06:19AM 0 points [-]

I suppose it's better that to never have suffered through frequentist statistics first, but I think you appreciate the right way a lot more after you've had to suffer through the wrong way for a while.

Comment author: [deleted] 26 January 2014 09:42:46AM 0 points [-]

Well, Jaynes does point out how bad frequentism is as often as he can get away with. I guess the main thing you're missing out if you weren't previously familiar with it is knowing whether he's attacking a strawman.

Comment author: jsteinhardt 26 January 2014 07:00:59AM 0 points [-]

I agree, that's why I'm glad I learned Bayes first. Makes you appreciate the good stuff more.

Comment author: [deleted] 26 January 2014 09:43:47AM 1 point [-]

Did you misread the comment you're replying to, are you sarcastic, or am I missing something?