John_Maxwell_IV comments on Open thread, January 25- February 1 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (316)
John_Maxwell_IV and I were recently wondering about whether it's a good idea to try to drink more water. At the moment my practice is "drink water ad libitum, and don't make too much of an effort to always have water at hand". But I could easily switch to "drink ad libitum, and always have a bottle of water at hand". Many people I know follow the second rule, and this definitely seems like something that's worth researching more because it literally affects every single day of your life. Here are the results of 3 minutes of googling:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002822399000486:
So how much is 2% dehydration? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dehydration#Differential_diagnosis : "A person's body, during an average day in a temperate climate such as the United Kingdom, loses approximately 2.5 litres of water.[citation needed]" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_water quotes Arthur Guyton 's Textbook of Medical Physiology: "the total amount of water in a man of average weight (70 kilograms) is approximately 40 litres, averaging 57 percent of his total body weight." So effects on cognition become apparent after 40l*2%=800ml of water has been lost, which takes roughly 800ml/(2.5l/24h) = 8 hours. Now, this assumes water is lost at a constant rate, which is false, but it still seems like it would take a while to lose a full 800ml. Which implies that you don't have to make a conscious effort to drink more water because everybody gets at least mildly thirsty after, say, half an hour of walking around outside on a warm day, which seems like it would be a lot less than 800ml.
http://freebeacon.com/michelle-obamas-drink-more-water-campaign-based-on-faulty-science/ : “There really isn’t data to support this,” said Dr. Stanley Goldfarb of the University of Pennsylvania. “I think, unfortunately, frankly, they’re not basing this on really hard science. It’s not a very scientific approach they’ve taken. … To make it a major public health effort, I think I would say it’s bizarre.” Goldfarb, a kidney specialist, took particular issue with White House claims that drinking more water would boost energy. ”The idea drinking water increases energy, the word I’ve used to describe it is: quixotic,” he said. “We’re designed to drink when we’re thirsty. … There’s no need to have more than that.”
http://ask.metafilter.com/166600/Drinking-more-water-should-make-me-less-thirsty-right : When you don't drink a lot of water your body retains liquid because it knows it's not being hydrated. It will conserve and reabsorb liquid. When you start drinking enough water to stay more than hydrated your body will start using the water and then dispensing of it as needed. Your acuity for thirst will be activated in a different way and in a sense work better.
Some thoughts:
Thoughts? Please post your own opinion if you're knowledgeable about this or if you've researched it.
Thanks for writing this up.
Lots of things fall in to this category :)
In case it's not obvious: this probably means in the absence of food/fluid consumption. You can't go on losing 2.5 litres of water a day indefinitely.
I assumed it wasn't net, but the amount of water excreted, regardless of consumption. Though those probably are not unrelated processes.