Jack comments on What is Evidence? - Less Wrong

60 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 22 September 2007 06:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Ivan_Tishchenko 28 March 2010 09:07:34AM *  1 point [-]

However, I can think of some instances in which perhaps "blind faith" is warranted. For instance, I can not conceive of a situation that would make 2+2 = 4 false. Perhaps for that reason, my belief in 2+2=4 is unconditional

Yes, it is conditional. For example, I guess, if you had put two stones next to other two, then calculated and found that there is _five stones in total, that would be a proof that 2+2 not equal to 4. This is how your belief "2+2=4" could be falsified.

Comment author: Jack 28 March 2010 09:41:16AM *  3 points [-]

I know this is Eliezer's line but it still looks like nonsense to me. This experience would be evidence stones have a tendency to spontaneously appear when four stones are put next to each other.

Comment author: dylgramac 16 December 2010 06:44:01PM 2 points [-]

I have a simpler reason that the belief 2+2 = 4 is not blind. When he says he has blind faith because "I can not conceive of a situation that would make 2+2 = 4 false." it is not blind because he is trying to find an alternative rather than entirely avoiding questioning his belief.