lessdazed comments on What is Evidence? - Less Wrong

60 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 22 September 2007 06:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Arandur 04 May 2011 03:36:45AM -2 points [-]

Great article, and it helps me explain to my friend that my faith is not, in fact, blind.

One problem: communication via the spirit from God to an individual is an epiphenomenon. So it can't be proven externally? That's one instance of a rational belief that isn't contagious, though I suppose that's why there are people who doubt the existence of epiphenomena altogether.

Comment author: lessdazed 27 July 2011 10:28:16PM *  1 point [-]

Wikipedia says:

In philosophy of mind, epiphenomenalism is the view that mental phenomena are epiphenomena in that they can be caused by physical phenomena, but cannot cause physical phenomena.

I'm not sure what to call non-physical things changing the physical world, but it seems the communication you describe, if possible, would be non-physical to physical, right?

Comment author: Arandur 27 July 2011 10:52:49PM 0 points [-]

You are, of course, correct. :3 I used the wrong term.

Comment author: lessdazed 27 July 2011 10:58:12PM 0 points [-]

Is that because there isn't a right term? I don't know it if there is.

Comment author: Arandur 28 July 2011 02:27:41AM 0 points [-]

Perhaps there ought to be. Let's invent one!