malcolmocean comments on On saving the world - Less Wrong

101 Post author: So8res 30 January 2014 08:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (166)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MondSemmel 30 March 2014 11:33:53AM *  5 points [-]

I liked this series a lot. Thanks for writing it.

But I couldn't resist this small math nitpick: "But if the chance that one person can save the world is one in a million, then there had better be a million people trying." -> That's a great quote, but we can be more precise:

If these probabilities were indeed independent (which they can't possibly be, but still), and a million people tried with a chance of 1 in a million each, then the chance P that the world is saved is only P=1-(999999/1000000)^1000000=63.2%. If we want the world to be saved with probability P, we need x people trying, where x =ln(1-P)/ln(0.999999). For instance, to achieve 99% (which isn't good enough), we need 4.6 million people; to get 99.99%, we need 9.2 million people, and so on.

Comment author: malcolmocean 29 July 2015 08:34:15AM 1 point [-]

I was amused to note that Nate's site (click "More »") now reads:

"If there's only a one in a million chance someone can save the world, then there'd better be well more than a million people trying."