gregv comments on Arthur Chu: Jeopardy! champion through exemplary rationality - Less Wrong

22 Post author: syllogism 02 February 2014 08:02AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (24)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 05 February 2014 03:36:29AM *  2 points [-]

I was curious about the second link. The gist appears to be:

In other words, even when the people speaking loudest or most eloquently don’t intentionally discourage participation from people who are not like them... entertaining ‘politically incorrect’ or potentially harmful ideas out loud, in public (so to speak) signals people who would be impacted by said ideas that they are not welcome.

I think the idea is that rationalists are more likely to entertain potentially offensive ideas under the premise that traditional morals/boundaries/taboos may interfere or bias totally clear, unflinching rational thinking.

Comment author: jkaufman 05 February 2014 01:14:10PM 0 points [-]

Yup! And Arthur thinks some ideas (racism, sexism, etc) are harmful to discuss, partly because the discussion legitimizes them.