chaosmage comments on Rationality Quotes February 2014 - Less Wrong

5 [deleted] 02 February 2014 01:35PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (482)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: glomerulus 19 February 2014 10:29:39PM 5 points [-]

There are more reasons to do it than training your system 1. It sounds like it would be an interesting experience and make a good story. Interesting experiences are worth their weight in insights, and good stories are useful to any goals that involve social interaction.

Comment author: chaosmage 20 February 2014 12:26:06PM 2 points [-]

Also, graveyards at night are a lot less crowded then parks, i.e. awesome for outdoors sex.

Comment author: [deleted] 20 February 2014 03:16:32PM 1 point [-]

Isn't that rather disrespectful to the dead? Yes, I realize the dead are not physically alive to be appalled, but I still think a graveyard is a place of life-taking, not life-making. We ought respect that.

Comment author: blacktrance 20 February 2014 03:27:30PM 1 point [-]

Why should we respect that? As you said, the dead don't care.

Comment author: shminux 20 February 2014 10:19:01PM 4 points [-]

"Respect for the dead" is a shorthand for "Respect for the living who care about the dead".

Comment author: polymathwannabe 20 February 2014 10:23:16PM 0 points [-]

So, when I commemorate my friend J.'s death every year, I'm really honoring myself?

Comment author: fubarobfusco 21 February 2014 04:01:55AM 1 point [-]

You may be making yourself a better person; but J. is — alas — not around to receive benefit.

Comment author: [deleted] 20 February 2014 03:35:34PM 1 point [-]

Do you prefer them to be dead? Also, what of their living relatives who come to the graveyard to mourn?

Comment author: blacktrance 20 February 2014 03:41:15PM 2 points [-]

I don't prefer them to be dead, but I'm not making them any more dead by being in a graveyard. As for the living relatives - some may not like it, but that alone doesn't necessarily mean that it's wrong to do so, as they're not actually being harmed, only their sensibilities are being offended.

Comment author: glomerulus 20 February 2014 03:58:18PM 3 points [-]

It's not rude if it's not a social setting. If no one sees you do it, no one's sensibilities are offended.

Comment author: [deleted] 20 February 2014 03:43:09PM 1 point [-]

So we can at least agree that it's extremely rude, but you place less moral value on the rudeness than I do?

Comment author: blacktrance 20 February 2014 03:44:33PM 0 points [-]

I'm not sure that it's "extremely rude". Is it extremely rude for a gay couple to hold hands in a conservative Southern small town, even though that would offend people?

Comment author: TheOtherDave 20 February 2014 04:51:23PM 1 point [-]

For my own part, I would agree that holding hands with my husband in such an environment is rude. (I don't know what "extremely" means here, but I would probably agree with that as well.)

I would also agree that it's worth doing.

Comment author: Vulture 20 February 2014 09:54:35PM -1 points [-]

And arguably has greater social value than having sex in a graveyard.

Comment author: Vulture 20 February 2014 09:53:45PM *  0 points [-]

Well it would be a bit of a dick move to let eli_sennesh or others who would feel similarly find out about your actions. Of course, this restriction tends to cripple the "charming anecdote" advantage.

Comment author: Vulture 20 February 2014 02:40:53PM *  0 points [-]

And going in with that intention would provide a very powerful motivation to lose one's alief in ghosts!