If whoever voted me down for this post, and the post previous in the thread would explain why I'd appreciate it.

In objective discussions about graphs, I feel like we 'aspiring rationalists' ought to be able to come to an agreement about the data in the graph (if perhaps not the causal story behind it), and downvotes for discussing the actual graphs linked to seem to me to be counterproductive.

If I've broken some social norm, I'd appreciate being explicitly told.