JTHM comments on Items to Have In Case of Emergency...Maybe. - Less Wrong

25 [deleted] 03 April 2014 12:23AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (76)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MichaelAnissimov 10 April 2014 03:00:30AM 3 points [-]

No one is going to use gold because it's too valuable by weight and too difficult to measure tiny quantities. Instead, buy pre-1965 silver dimes. Silver is a much more reasonable price by weight.

Comment author: JTHM 12 April 2014 09:04:58PM *  3 points [-]

Too valuable in the current economy to measure in small quantities, sure. But in a postapocalyptic wasteland, the economy will have shrunk drastically while the available quantity of gold stays the same. Hence, gold is the new silver and silver is the new tin.

Comment author: MichaelAnissimov 13 April 2014 06:49:10AM 2 points [-]

An "apocalypse" like nuclear war is not particularly likely to kill off more than half the population, at most.

Comment author: JTHM 13 April 2014 02:05:52PM 2 points [-]

If a first-world country suffers a calamity in which half its population dies, it'll lose nine-tenths of its economic output at least.

Comment author: MichaelAnissimov 22 April 2014 12:20:36AM 2 points [-]

Good point. I find it pretty hard to believe that people would start using gold instead of silver for casual transactions, but I suppose it's possible.