torekp comments on Preferences without Existence - Less Wrong

14 Post author: Coscott 08 February 2014 01:34AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (101)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: torekp 09 February 2014 05:29:41PM 0 points [-]

Excellent. I favor something like "X will be implied by our best explanation of experience" rather than "X is within the visible universe", but I think broadly speaking, we're in agreement here. But note that this definition of "existence" allows me to dismiss most of Tegmark's Level IV objects as nonexistent. (Your version would allow the dismissal of more.) And of course I'm also free not to share the preference pattern of caring less about events/life-stories in proportion to their complexity.

Comment author: Coscott 09 February 2014 10:14:18PM 0 points [-]

I try to justify my preference pattern here http://lesswrong.com/lw/jn2/preferences_without_existence/aj4w