Angela comments on Calorie Restriction: My Theory and Practice - Less Wrong

7 Post author: brazil84 12 February 2014 01:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (33)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Angela 18 October 2014 07:43:36AM 1 point [-]

If slowing metabolism increases longevity, how come exercise, which increases metabolism, is beneficial?

As an endurance runner with a BMI of ~20 on an eat-as-much-as-you-like diet, is my calorie consumption is optimal for longevity?

Comment author: brazil84 18 October 2014 06:50:34PM *  0 points [-]

If slowing metabolism increases longevity, how come exercise, which increases metabolism, is beneficial?

I think that's a really good question.

I can throw out a few ideas, but they are somewhat speculative:

  1. Perhaps one can analogize the human body to a car. If you drive a car all the time it will wear out quicker. But if you leave it sitting in your driveway, it's also bad.

  2. If you increase your metabolism through exercise, at least you don't have the problem of extra energy sitting around in your body which can be used through mischief.

  3. A lot of exercise really does wear out your body quicker, but the benefits outweigh the harm.

  4. The increased metabolism from exercise is primarily focused in your muscles which can handle it; muscles are not prone to cancer.

Edit: Oh, and of course Number 5: My hypothesis is dead wrong.

As an endurance runner with a BMI of ~20 on an eat-as-much-as-you-like diet, is my calorie consumption is optimal for longevity?

Since I think mild restriction is better than ad libitum eating, I would guess "no." Although your low weight suggests that for you, ad libitum eating is somewhat restrictive anyway.