Well, that sounds obviously wrong - it would mean you could start with a universe you liked, scale up the population without changing average quality of life at all, and end up with a universe in which you want to destroy all life.
What makes this obviously wrong? I mean, aside from preferences, why would it not make sense to start with a universe in a current state you like and end up with a state you dislike?
This is part of a two-week experiment on having more open threads.
Obvious answers aren't always obvious. If you feel silly for not understanding something, you're not alone. Ask a question here.
Previous stupid questions
Other similar threads include: