I'm not focused so much on the misogyny or homophobia as their attitude about the bailout and the poor. That they act like fraternity people isn't really an issue. But its a clear demonstration of their private contempt for anyone who isn't filthy rich.
As far as viable alternatives go, America was supposed to be a viable alternative to monarchy, but really it just put a new label on it. The world's history of making viable alternatives is pretty crappy. Most social change appears to have come from attacking the status quo.
But its a clear demonstration of their private contempt for anyone who isn't filthy rich.
Could you be more specific about what exactly you would like to be different?
Do you think that despising outgroups is a rare behavior, and we should remove all power from those who do? Do you think it is a frequent but not universal behavior, so we should find those exceptional individuals who don't have it, and give all power to them? Do you think the attitude is universal, but we should make sure that the powerful people are never allowed to express it, even in privacy (in other words: that the powerful people should have no privacy)? Something else?
This is part of a two-week experiment on having more open threads.
Obvious answers aren't always obvious. If you feel silly for not understanding something, you're not alone. Ask a question here.
Previous stupid questions
Other similar threads include: