= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
PeterDonis comments on Self-Congratulatory Rationalism - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (395)
I'm not sure this qualifier is necessary. Your argument is sufficient to establish your point (which I agree with) even if you do trust the other's rationality.
Personally, I am entirely in favor of the "I don't trust your rationality either" qualifier.
Is that because you think it's necessary to Wei_Dai's argument, or just because you would like people to be up front about what they think?