RichardKennaway comments on How to teach to magical thinkers? - Less Wrong

14 Post author: polymathwannabe 24 February 2014 01:43PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (79)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 24 February 2014 04:27:51PM 25 points [-]

They basically stopped short of calling the scientific method a cultural construct, at which point I'm sure I would have snapped.

I can't resist...

Did scientific method grow on a tree, or did people invent it?

Did people invent scientific method simultaneously everywhere, or was it invented and practiced at specific places?

:D

The real fallacy in my opinion is having a connotation that if something is constructed and promoted within a culture, that makes it wrong. For example, consider the Pythagorean theorem... knowing that Pythagoras was a rich white cis male, shouldn't we remove it from the curriculum? And perhaps replace it with something more enlightened, such as: "all sides of a triangle are equal, even if their lengths may be different".

In the same sense, science, even rationality itself, are cultural constructs. Maybe even human speech is a cultural construct, but luckily that happened sufficiently long ago so now all cultures have it. Okay, I am not sure about the last example. But I am sure that calling things "cultural constructs" is a cultural construct itself.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 25 February 2014 09:24:30AM 5 points [-]

Did scientific method grow on a tree, or did people invent it?

It grew on a tree. Olives grow on trees too, but no-one knew you could eat them until someone discovered that soaking them in brine makes them edible.

Or less metaphorically, science was discovered, not invented. It works for reasons that have nothing to do with us.