Lumifer comments on "Smarter than us" is out! - Less Wrong

24 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 25 February 2014 03:50PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (56)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jiro 26 February 2014 09:27:45PM 0 points [-]

Normal publishers filter books for many aspects that would lead a reader to not want to read the book. While it's true that not much filtering is done on accuracy and integrity, the aspects that the books are filtered on are still ones that typical readers care about. Relying on the user's lack of knowledge of the publisher to make him think such filtering has been done, when it has not, is dark arts, deceptive, or whatever other term for bad things you like to use.

In other words, "I'm not tricking a user into reading an inaccurate book, I'm just tricking the user into reading a boring and poorly written book" isn't an excuse.

Comment author: Lumifer 27 February 2014 02:28:32AM *  2 points [-]

Your line of argument looks strange to me. Basically, you are saying that any writer MUST go through gatekeepers to reach his readers and if he bypasses the gatekeepers that's fraud and deceit upon the readers. I don't find this approach reasonable.

Comment author: Jiro 27 February 2014 08:44:26AM 2 points [-]

Choosing to self-publish your book with the intention of having your readers mistake it for a non-self-published book is deceptive.