satt comments on Is IQ what we actually need to know? - Less Wrong

1 Post author: NancyLebovitz 25 February 2014 06:21PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (53)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: satt 26 February 2014 03:11:17AM 1 point [-]

The literature is clear that unstructured interviews are worthless, and IQ testing is the best measure we have, typically explaining about half of the variance.

Side note: my understanding is that the correlation is about one half, so about a quarter of the variance is explained.