fubarobfusco comments on Rational Evangelism - Less Wrong

9 Post author: aarongertler 26 February 2014 06:00AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (150)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 26 February 2014 11:25:32PM 1 point [-]

A number of Christian theological sources hold that the blessed in heaven will witness the suffering of the damned in hell, and that the suffering of the damned shall contribute in some regard to the satisfaction or pleasure of the blessed.

The nature of this contribution is a matter of some dispute, though. Some theological sources take it to be a contrast: heaven looks even better if you know the alternative exists. Some take it to be satisfaction with the perfect justice of God. And for some it's pretty stark schadenfreude. Across these sources, though, the blessed are seen as incapable of experiencing pity, because pity is a form of suffering and they are incapable of suffering.

For a number of sources on the subject, see this master's thesis in theology.

William Lane Craig disagrees, though, holding that God may shield the blessed from awareness of the suffering of the damned.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 27 February 2014 07:46:00AM *  0 points [-]

Which shows that Craig is more the politician than the Christian. Whatever happened to "Thy will be done!"?

It's God's will that the majority of mankind gets tortured eternally. If you don't approve, if you aren't eager to pour on the hot coals yourself, you're not a real Christian. His will be done!