Gunnar_Zarncke comments on The ecological rationality of the bad old fallacies - Less Wrong

7 Post author: velisar 19 March 2014 11:39AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (13)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 19 March 2014 12:46:14PM 1 point [-]

Agreed. But it kind of means that some evolution of fallacies trending toward more complex argumentation patterns is taking place. Or? I'm not versed in the classics but I take it that they didn't have this large an (anti-)tool-set.

Comment author: velisar 19 March 2014 03:09:06PM 0 points [-]

I think any preoccupation, if it exists long enough, results in great refinements. The are people good a African rare languages, mineral water, all sorts of (noble!) sports, torture - why should't people get better at something as common as argumentation.

But we're advocating a look the other way around, to the more basic processes, they may say something about how humans work. And indeed, it would be easier with less sophisticated arguers.