Okeymaker comments on Avoiding Your Belief's Real Weak Points - Less Wrong

49 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 05 October 2007 01:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (203)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Romashka 08 April 2015 05:58:09PM 0 points [-]

Okay then, could you please answer my earlier question about scientific consensus in one particular instance? State your own opinion. It seems meta-relevant to the discussion. (My impression so far is that you are not as accepting of d-separation as the general public here. As in, the set of mammals and the set of unicellular organisms are d-separated, and at least one set that 'blocks' mammals from unicellulars is 'part of reptiles'. It means that learning some new feature about mammals, you can theorize about the corresponding feature/lack of it in reptiles, but you can't infer much about unicellulars. Consider this model: God -> Physics -> Civilization. God and Civilization are d-separated, with Physics as the blocking set.)

Comment author: [deleted] 08 April 2015 06:28:50PM 0 points [-]

Sorry, I am too stupid to understand what you ask of me. I don´t even know what d-separation is.

Comment author: Romashka 08 April 2015 06:34:29PM 1 point [-]

I, too, hadn't known about it before joining LW. Make a search on the site or on Wiki, and there is a book by Judea Pearl about causality that can be downloaded from web. It is a bit heavy, though, I am struggling to read it.