= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Oscar_Cunningham comments on [Link] Zack Weinersmith's One-Liner Generator - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (7)
Perhaps you should link to the article directly. At first I was trying to figure out the connection between densely packed Hitlers and one-line generators. (Edit: My mistake the link was there I just didn't see it)
Also, unless you want to elaborate, maybe this should go into the open thread?
They did link to the source as "(source)" (see the bottom line of their post). But I agree that this should be in the open thread.
I completely missed that the first time, thank you. Is there a way to only retract part of a post?
No, but you can just add an edit saying something like "Wrong; see below".
Thank you. Fixed