Squark comments on Logical thermodynamics: towards a theory of self-trusting uncertain reasoning - Less Wrong

5 Post author: Squark 28 March 2014 04:06PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (4)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Squark 29 March 2014 04:57:39PM 1 point [-]

Evidence with long length is weighted less since it contributes less to the energy.

When computing probabilities at finite temperature to finite precision, it should be possible to ignore long evidence (at least evidence which is long wrt the given sentence). If the shortest evidence for a sentence is very long, it means its probability is "marginal" in some sense (since the total energy depends weakly on the value of the probability field at this statement). For sentences which cannot be decomposed into simpler sentences using propositional calculus operations, "marginal" probably means close to 1/2.

Comment author: Manfred 29 March 2014 08:04:40PM 0 points [-]

Oh, whoops. Yeah, my bad.