ericyu3 comments on A strange implication of critical-level utilitarianism - Less Wrong

-1 Post author: ericyu3 05 April 2014 07:54AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (7)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ericyu3 10 April 2014 08:47:44AM *  0 points [-]

The A factor drops out of the final expression for the optimal wage. If the form of the production function is the same between two countries, their optimal wages will be the same as well. However, their optimal populations will obviously be different. For example, if country 1 has 10 times higher A than country 2, but their values of alpha are the same, then their optimum wages are the same, but country 1's optimum population is higher by a factor of 10^(1/(1-alpha)).

Here, A lumps together productivity and the amount of land a country has (so that a large poor country may have higher A than a small rich one). Obviously, increasing A will increase welfare, but it won't change the optimal wage (if the country is above that level already, increasing A will bring wages further away from the optimum) - the best thing to do (according to this model) is to increase A as much as possible, and also adjust the population level to match the optimal wage.