Gunnar_Zarncke comments on How Tim O'Brien gets around the logical fallacy of generalization from fictional evidence - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (12)
Ah yes. There are at least two aspects in the 'war stories': The 'probabilistic' aspect which indeed I didn't mention and the 'no plot, no sense' part which I do see in the failure to double guess and the confusion it leaves the reader in.
One could argue though that as this is repeated and repeated between Harry and Quirrell and thus kind of probabilistic.